![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Software as Fast Fashion
Jan. 15th, 2026 10:11 pm![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png){kind=small}
tante_feedClothes have never been cheaper. These days a t-shirt is often cheaper that a decent cup of tea in a cafe. The wonders of capitalism. At least that is how it is often described. And when you point at the underpaid, gruesome labor that people in poorer regions of the planet have to do to make this possible the answer tends to be: “Well, they are having jobs and can provide for their families now, so it’s reducing poverty.”
Now of course the situation is a bit more complex, has more angles. Because fast fashion causes about 10% of the world’s carbon emissions (about one EU), that is more than all international flights and all maritime shipping combined. And because the clothing is cheap and what experts call shit it ends up in a landfill or burned. Because those shirts and pants don’t survive contact with the real world for long.
Fast fashion is not about durability and sustainability, it’s about novelty. Not just can fashion companies sell you more stuff, get you into their stores more often, you can also express yourself more. Buy a fun t-shirt just for this one party. Or – maybe even worse – just for a haul video on Instagram or TikTok.
But if you do not think about the context, the externalities (fancy way of saying the way it fucks up the world and the people in it) too much, fast fashion is great: You have a fun idea about how to attend a party or how to make a statement of any kind somewhere and you can probably order something for cheap.
This is exactly where we are with software now. We are turning software into fast fashion. Because “AI”.
One of the current trends in software is “vibe coding”: You no longer have a person who more or less knows what they are doing write software but you have an LLM do it. There’s a few optimized ones out there that even get the code to actually compile or run most of the time. Sometimes the results are even correct.
This is often framed as liberation: Every human being can now have the software tool they want. Without having to learn to code or without having to ask someone else. You think it, you get it.
Now most people will admit that the code is utter garbage. It’s inconsistent, inefficient and mostly unmaintainable. But it does what the user wants it to do … maybe. So who cares? We don’t need to maintain this stuff. If we need something similar later we don’t build on this, we just have it generated anew.
Software is no longer seen as an asset, as something to care for, to maybe even take pride in. It’s a throw-away product. Like a napkin. Just get one quick, wipe your mouth and throw it away. Like a novelty t-shirt.
There is software you need only once. A quick script to automate a few things. Like renaming a bunch of files or so. And if LLMs would just be used to write those I would care a lot less about it.
But that’s not the narrative: The promise is that you can built full online services or meaningful products (think a web browser) that way. It might even work almost. Some of the time.
Software has become an important part of our lives. It structures a significant part of our experiences given how much time we spend in front of some sort of screen. The vision that “AI” companies are selling under the label “democratization” of software development is a world where the only clothes you can buy are fast fashion throw away items. Shirts that are basically not worth putting into the washing machine cause they won’t survive anyway.
But just as with fast fashion there are consequences. Let’s not even talk about the environmental cost of LLM use, the water, the electricity, the e-waste.
When was the last time you were really frustrated by a piece of software you had to use? Your bank’s app not allowing you to change your address but forcing you to talk to a chat bot that kept trying to do the wrong thing. Your music player making your laptop’s fan spin eating up your battery while not playing any music, just generating a “busy” cursor. Your email client crashing while you are writing. The options are endless. How long ago was that? An hour? 5 minutes?
Software has gotten bad in weird ways. It’s not just that everything is basically just a half-assed website pretending to be an app with even simple text editors bringing almost a whole browser along just to show a bunch of characters on the screen (as long as the file doesn’t get long). I have to use Microsoft 365 at work and literally none of the paid tools work properly. Features are missing or just do not work as documented. Everything is dog slow and doesn’t integrate well. Now apply that everywhere.
I am not a fashionable or stylish person. I basically buy a thing that works 5-10 times and then I am done for a long time. But I am in the position that I don’t have to buy fast fashion (and I know some people have so few resources that that is the only thing they have access to, it’s tragic) and I would never buy a shitty t-shirt for 5 bucks or whatnot that will annoy me after 3 rounds of laundry. I want to have the things in my life work. Ideally be even a bit nice. And I think we all deserve that. Deserve having access to objects that have a level of quality and care put into them.
It’s not just about giving people access to something. My guiding ethic is to give people access to good things. Because that’s what is right.
I keep coming back to the Captain Samuel Vimes ‘Boots’ theory of socio-economic unfairness from Terry Pratchett’s novel Men at Arms:
The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. … A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. … But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
We are working towards a digital world where we’ll all be having wet feet. And that makes me very sad.
Personal computing
Jan. 7th, 2026 11:44 pmtante_feedWhen computers entered the homes it was often as toys or toy-like artifacts: These machines, usually called “home computers“, were often used like gaming consoles with magazines giving you code to type in to have simple games on them. Their use was limited to people who wanted to play arcade games without losing all your money or people who just loved technology.
After a while and through some marketing the term personal computer was established and describes the machines people have at home till this day (Apple probably would disagree since they love to always invent their own lingo to claim to be unique, but TBH fuck Apple). The personal computer was a stand alone system that people could run at home for their personal (but of course also professional) tasks: Word processing, some simple data management, gaming and later media consumption and the web.
I find the prefix “personal” a bit underexplored. As I remarked in my post about my attempts to untangle my personal infrastructure from billionaires and fascists:
I think that infrastructures are deeply personal because our needs and wants are personal. The way we have pushed for a harmonization of everyone’s digital life through centralized platforms for the last decades has been a deeply inhumane endeavor.
I thought it might make sense to dwell on this a bit more.
The Platform Age
My family got their first computer when I was still in primary school so somewhere in the middle/end of the 1980ies. It was an Epson 80286 with an amber monitor. It came with some software for certain tasks and I remember my mom getting the word processor she was also using at work because she knew how it worked.
Even with later computers: Whenever you got a new device (think a Sound Card – those didn’t used to be built-in) you got some new software with it, there was the shareware scene where you got little programs and tools on disks attached to magazines or something. But what was interesting is how nobody’s computer looked the same. Sure. At some point everyone had Windows 3.11 or even Windows95 at some point but the sets of tools were a lot more local. I remember how when one got to a new school, met new kids that they’d use completely different tools for the same things and one would (not usually legally) share whatever nifty thing one had access to.
The software landscape wasn’t ideal or maybe even better, but it was highly personalized. Mostly based on software being not that easy to get.
Then came the platforms. Not only did Microsoft win the battle around office tools but web platforms created these very streamlined, homogenized infrastructures that – because many were free – everyone adopted. Think Google Mail and Docs for mailing and collaborative editing. Operating Systems kept getting more and more locked down – mobile platforms being the worst offenders in this regard – and the app stores with their ratings would make sure that everyone would pick the same tool when searching for he same thing.
The promise of the “global village” was manifesting through centralized platforms everyone was on: How could you be a digital participant without a Facebook or a Google account?
Criticism against this is often framed in terms of anti-monopoly rhetoric: It’s bad if everyone is on the same platform because it harms the market and one player gets too much power and all that. But I think it’s also very inhumane, very violent in a way. We are different, our needs and wants, our skills and willingness to endure friction in our computing are different. And all that heterogeneity is made invisible, untouchable. It’s not that these systems actively fight our individuality, they make expressing it, make perceiving where you want to reshape something harder.
The monoculture of digital infrastructures has made people forget (or never learn) that software is by definition malleable. But the iPad taught people to just be good consumers and shut the fuck up. (Not just the iPad but I love hating on those devices. Grant me some fun here.)
The Anything Systems
There has been a response to those thoughts. Because of course we all see ourselves as brilliant individuals who have specific desires and needs. I call those the “Anything Systems”.
Some of you might know Notion but there’s a whole bunch of systems like that. Notion allows you to build your own workflows and data structures: It’s not a knowledge management system with clearly defined processes and capabilities. It’s more a set of building blocks for you to express yourself.
Not this might sound like a great approach: You can now build exactly your workflows and tools even without programming. But we are losing something when end-user software no longer carries semantics.
Stephen Farrugia (follow him) could probably go on quite the tangent here but you are stuck with me so here it goes: Anything Systems are not tools. As I have written about when it comes to generative “AI” systems, a tool is not just a thing that you maybe can use for a specific purpose. A tool is designed for that purpose, it contains assumptions about the problem space, you as the user of the tool, it is often the current iteration of a long line of attempts to optimize a certain tool for specific use cases. When people want to talk about tools and they are looking for a simple example they often use a hammer but if you have ever worked on a construction site you will know that there are many different kinds of hammers for very specific use cases, materials, contexts etc. “Hammer” is not an object but a category of objects.
Anything Systems claim to help you built the best workflow or solution for your case but they disconnect you from the experience and expertise that goes into the design and development of tools: A good tool brings with it an understanding of how to solve a problem the optimal way. That sometimes takes a bit of learning or the realization that a specific tool and its approach does not work for you or your context but it is a large part of what makes tools so good: You are not poking in the darkness hoping to figure out a good solution on your own, you are standing on the shoulders of giants.
Anything Systems give you a great box of toys to play around with but when things do not work for you, it’s your fault for not configuring it right. It’s a form of refusing to take responsibility for the things you put out into the world. The opposite of what I consider engineering to be. Anything Systems will keep you busy though: You can keep dicking around with your processes and structures for the rest of your life without ever really being happy with it. Maybe if you add just another thing then it will be perfect? Those systems are absolutely fantastic if you want to mask the bullshittiness of your job but are you really making progress? Or are you keeping busy?
The Everything Machines
We are not in the age of what the journalist Karen Hao calls “Everything Machines”, the age of so-called “AI”. This is an interesting amalgamation of the platform logic and the Anything System: Modern “AI”s want to turn everything into a chat interface (JUST LIKE IN STAR TREK!!!11). There is just one way of setting up digital interfaces: As chatbots. That is the future. And the present.
But those systems are not exactly specific. When you open ChatGPT it basically tells you to ask it anything. The interface and UI claims the system can do everything. Which is true if you don’t know much about the thing you are dealing with or are willing to accept garbage solutions. But that’s of course not the promise. The promise is that you have a subservient, willing slave-genius at your disposal – for a small fee.
Recently one of the banks I have an account with changed their whole interface. I can no longer see my account information on a website or in the app. I have to ask a chatbot for that information. Because chat is the only interface left. How could one just build a small form on a web site that allows me to change my address or anything? That’s past shit. Legacy design. Everything needs to be a chatbot because chatbots can do everything. Well. There’s still that asterisk.
Personal computing
As I wrote in my article on rebuilding my digital infrastructure: That article is not a howto. You probably should not do what I did because your needs are different. Maybe some things I did make sense to you and you can apply. Some might not fit your needs, budget or are things you don’t want to deal with. That is very healthy thinking.
I think it is important to share more about or computing with each other. But not (only) in the form of howtos but more as a small tour with explanations. Why did you pick certain tools and not others? What did you want to achieve? Which inconveniences are you living with?
I was very lucky. I grew up in a time where digital infrastructure wasn’t so standardized and locked down. Where I could experience the digital as something to built and shape and change. When I look at my 5 year old son I wonder if he will have that opportunity. And I want him to have that, I want him to experience that digital systems can be humane and can enhance our lives as long as we can shape them around our needs and that that reshaping is possible and doable.
I still really like technology. I like building systems for myself or others that work based on what the users want and need. And I don’t want to glorify the old days too much: Yeah, everyone’s system was different but it was often hard to collaborate and share. Because file formats and whatever.
Personal computing must be based on individual human or group needs but also on the technology side based on open standards that allow different tools and infrastructures to connect and share and collaborate. And it’s a social project of all of us building things, trying things, learning from one another. So we can built upon each others successes and failures. It’s “human needs, community sharing and standards” instead of “platforms” or “everything machines”.
That’s what I want to keep pushing more towards.
Exiting the Billionaire Castle
Jan. 5th, 2026 10:11 pmtante_feedIn 2025 I have spend some time to untangle my digital life from billionaire/fascist (that Venn diagram is becoming more of a circle each and every day) run platforms. So at the beginning of 2026 maybe it makes sense to talk a bit about what I did, why I went certain ways and what works and what doesn’t.
There are a few caveats. I am a trained computer scientist, I financed a lot of my university years by running people’s server infrastructure and I have been running some of my own for more than 2 decades now. My personal computers all run Linux so I am not bound to any proprietary platform like Microsoftslop’s or Apple’s I also am employed and have some disposable income which allows me to acquire hardware etc. So take that into consideration when evaluating my steps.
Also: This is not a howto. I think that infrastructures are deeply personal because our needs and wants are personal. The way we have pushed for a harmonization of everyone’s digital life through centralized platforms for the last decades has been a deeply inhumane endeavor. So what works for me might not at all work for you. Some things might though.
My Infrastructure pre Migration
I used a lot of Google’s services: Gmail for Email (with my own domain though), Google Photos for photo archival and sharing, Google Drive for Storage (since I already paid for extra Google Storage to keep my photos around) and Google Docs for writing, presentations etc. I had a free tier of Dropbox around for some secondary backup of encrypted data. Since I paid for Youtube to get rid of Ads I used Youtube Music for music streaming. I used Notion for notetaking/workflows etc.
For instant messaging I kept around accounts on basically all relevant services (WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, FB Messenger, etc.) to be reachable by my contacts who all have their preferences. I had already been running my own XMPP and Matrix servers though that got mostly homeopathic action though.
I was already hosting this website (and a few other things) on a root server I was renting at a German provider. Some code I published lived on GitHub.
I had already stopped using my Twitter account after Elon Musk took over and moved most of my social media use to Mastodon and a bit of Bluesky.
My Migrations
I’ll try splitting this block up a bit into coherent segments for easier reading/skimming.
Domain
I had already used my own domain for a long time (multiple actually). If you have any form of online presence and it’s fully dependent on the goodwill of rich people maybe get your own name on the internet, even if just to redirect it for now. I cannot stress how relevant that is. Your “$name.substack.com” is not yours.
I personally buy my domains at INWX, a registrar in Berlin (which coincidentally has their offices right opposite to my day job’s office, I used them before our offices moved there though). INWX basically only offers domains so it’s a bit of an expert thing, you can also get a domain when renting Webspace somewhere for example, might be less hassle.
I evaluated many different providers and self-hosting. Let’s start there: Self-hosting.
Self-hosting email is a pain in the ass. I do it for a legacy client and it’s a fucking clusterfuck (maybe due to his business domain but that’s not for here ;)). I do not need another job of cleaning up the mess when the big providers like Google or Microsoft start fucking around with smaller servers. The problem with email is that it kinda fails silently if you are not putting a lot of attention/work into it while it also being the anchor for almost anything (think account recovery, getting emails from your provider that your server will be shut down, etc). So self-hosting was more of a pain and a source of stress than I was willing to take on – my life is stressful enough.
When it came to evaluating different email providers I had the choice between the super privacy/encryption focused services like Proton or Tuta or more traditional offerings like Mailbox, Posteo or Fastmail. I like encryption as much as the next person but I shied away from Proton and Tuta because they require an extra, non-standard software to communicate with the server which is a bit too flimsy for my tastes. I’m an old man I like IMAP over transport encryption thankyouverymuch.
Both Mailbox and Posteo have the advantage of being run by German companies on German servers (under EU legislation) which is neat. Both are good choices.
I went with Fastmail though. They are an Australian company but are very focused on providing just what I need (good, standards based email, calendar and contact management) for a very fair price. Mailbox was a close second but I have a lot of email that I keep dragging around and Mailbox’s plans don’t have the storage I need. Fastmail also makes keeping some Google services around very easy: It continuously imports emails that hit your Gmail inbox (even with me switching my domain over to Fastmail some accounts are bound to my Google account and therefore hit the Gmail inbox) and it allows to use Google calendars seamlessly in their interface which I need since I have a shared calendar with my partner there.
The service itself works flawlessly and even has some cool features (their masked email implementation is great) and I could bring a whole bunch of domains in without any issue. My only issue is that Fastmail is an Australian company that hosts their servers in data centers in the US. That’s not great given the state of the world and might force me to switch at some point. But currently I am very happy with it. Migration was simple and the service mostly works better than Gmail.
Cloud Storage
I had done some tests with different solutions allowing one to set up their own cloud, some of them being rougher than others. So after that it was kinda obvious to me to go for Nextcloud due to it being open source, it being mature software and it having a big community of contributors. I evaluated renting a Nextcloud instance somewhere (there are many companies offering) but with me already paying for a root server (for this website for example) it made sense to just host it myself. This also mitigates the whole “someone else might be reading my files” kind of thread mode. I went for the Nextcloud AIO docker route for hosting: Most relevant parameters are set in a convenient way and I don’t have to worry about incompatibilities between different parts of the software stack.
Setup is really easy but if you want to host your own file storage make sure you have some offsite backup set up (which I already had for my server). No a RAID is not a backup.
For mere file storage and sync it works great. There’s clients for every operating system that just syncs your whole storage (or selected paths) down to your machine and let’s you work on stuff. Synchronization issues can appear when two machine open the same document locally but that’s not Nextcloud’s fault. Cleaning up those cases is not hard though.
Nextcloud also offers access via WebDAV which allows my ebook reader to load books from my digital library without having to sync it in full so that was a huge added benefit.
Nextcloud also offers calendar and contact management but I already use the Fastmail provided solutions for that. I will set up a sync from Fastmail to my Nextcloud in the next weeks though for backup purposes.
Cloud Documents
I was a heavy Google docs user. At work I have to use MS 365 but the collaboration features work spotty at best. But both were no options so I looked into what was available on Nextcloud (since I was already hosting that). There’s basically Collabora (based on Libreoffice) and OnlyOffice.
Onlyoffice might look a bit cleaner but it’s a project/company that actively hides its Russian origins and given the actions of Russia lately I am not comfortable integrating that kind of thing into my workflow.
I had already used Libreoffice on my Linux machine for light editing so I went for Collabora which Nextcloud integrates seamlessly.
It’s not Google Docs. Synchronization sometimes feels a bit fragile, the interface isn’t as clean (it’s gotten a lot better though lately). Google Docs really was my sweet spot between features and simplicity (probably because I used it for so long). So switching added some friction. Less so with the document editor for writing but with the spreadsheet and presentation applications: The presentation software works very differently from Google Sheets and changing themes is a lot clunkier. There are more features but the Interface is very much an acquired taste. The spreadsheet application works but Google Sheets was a lot easier to program (that might be me being used to it though).
After a few months I have now kinda gotten used to the Collabora stack. It works, it imports all your word files and whatnot. I sometimes wished I could have the simplicity of the Google Docs suite back.
But I have used it with external collaborators (think editors for articles etc) and didn’t have any issues or receive any complaints. Just be aware that it’s less clean than Google Docs. And I probably would not edit a very long document with a large amount of people there.
I did not evaluate purely text-based platforms like Cryptpad et al because I need a presentation and spreadsheet solution and didn’t want to hack that somehow into markdown editors. As I said: I am an old man with limited free time.
Photos
Looking for a Google Photos replacement is very easy these days: Immich just does the job. It’s basically a self-hosted full clone of Google Photos including shared albums, location tagging and face recognition. So you get all the features of Google Photos without training Google’s AI. Cool.
But Photos take up a lot of space so hosting it yourself can become quite expensive depending on what infrastructure you have access to. The machine learning features need a bit of a capable processor and it has modest RAM requirements so pricing for hosting often starts out at 10 bucks a month depending on the storage you need. Hosting your photos yourself has its advantages but paying Google or Apple will probably be cheaper.
In order to fully migrate my Google Photos I got myself a Google Photos Takeout which ended up being a bit over 150GB split over a few archives. I uploaded those to my server and fed them to immich-go which can automatically import not just the images but also the meta information (such as albums etc.).
Immich has a great mobile app for Android so my photos automatically get backed up without me even thinking about it. It’s basically a an almost perfect replacement. Some people like Ente which does even more encryption and whatnot but I didn’t need the extra complexity given I run all this on my own server. I am hosting Immich via their docker installation.
Notes/Workflows
I had a lot of sorta complex data bases and workflows set up on Notion for note-taking and keeping track of ToDos etc. But Notion is kind of a non-product. It keeps you building processes and structures that are never fully what you want so you can play productivity a lot. While Notion might not be owned by a classic billionaire from what I know it’s still a service that pushed their AI slopware a lot and is fully US-focused so change made sense.
I looked at many more or less complex self-hosted Notion alternatives such as Affine or Capacities but those again keep you playing on the meta level instead of focusing in what you need: They push you into creating huge note graveyards that don’t work for me.
So I went back to the drawing board and ended up not running another app but go with Nextcloud again: The Nextcloud Deck app gives me Kanban boards that suffice for my own ToDo management. I stripped down my own note taking and went for Nextcloud Collectives which is sort of a Wiki with templates for new pages that you can define yourself. When playing around I realized that I could throw away most of the Notion scaffolding and just use wiki pages (which end up technically being markdown text files in my Nextcloud).
This setup works for me right now. I don’t know if I am 100% happy with this and I might look into it more in the next months. But this process has led me to focusing on simpler tools instead of those “second brain” things that kinda fill your day with busywork. That might be my bias though.
But the simple Nexcloud approach works right now and was a good reset for how to think about my own infrastructure. Maybe cloning big corporate systems isn’t the way to go? Maybe decomputing is a better mode of thinking? Still not 100% sure where to land with this. The Nextcloud Apps don’t have mobile apps which can be a bummer and Collectives has a somewhat weird UI that one needs to get used to. But it’s working right now.
Code
Github still is the 800 pound gorilla when it comes to hosting code. Which I don’t do too much of but I have some repositories online that others use.
But given that Microslop is not only billionaire-owned and Trump aligned bit also one of the biggest unlicensed users of people’s source code for their slop generators (“AI”) I thought it might make sense to get my code to a less shady part of the Internet.
There is of course GitLab that one can host instead of using GitHub but GitLab is rails (which I don’t particularly like hosting) and GitLab is also pushing “AI” hard. I kinda cast it aside quickly.
The two other alternatives I found were either hosting my own Forgejo instance or finding one to use. I landed on the second option: Codeberg is a Forgejo instance run by a German association that residing about 10 minutes by bike from my home. They are very serious about community governance, proper processes (aside from just software development processes) and don’t think giving all code to Microsoft for free for them to make Code quality worse all over the planet is a good idea so they are the perfect solution. (I had given them some donations in the past but paused writing this to join the association so you could consider me biased now maybe? I dunno.)
So yeah. For hosting of code I use Codeberg.
Social Media
As I wrote I was already somewhat out of the billionaire hellhole. Twitter used to be my main social presence (with more than 35k followers) but I dropped it like a bad habit when Musk took over. So my main social is Mastodon on an instance I help administer. I do have a Bluesky account, too, but I do not trust that network all too much. The developers are basically blockchain people with money from Blockchain companies. Never a good sign. But it’s fun while it lasts right now. I just won’t get too attached to it, but it’s good to keep an eye on whether that system will at some point actually decentralize.
I also am still on LinkedIn which is billionaire owned. It sucks but it’s relevant for my job and my freelance activities. Would love to see it burn in hell but right now I can’t leave.
I still have a Facebook account (cause it’s a platform some relatives might use to contact me). I do no longer have the Facebook apps installed on my phones or use the website regularly. I check in every quarter or so to see if some aunt from overseas send me a message. The account is still alive because some third party accounts use it as login provider. I also have an Instagram account that I only use to follow tattoo artists (who sadly all just live on Instagram). Sucks but there literally is no alternative. I do not use other image-based social media sites (like Pixelfed) because personally I realized that these platforms just give me anxiety and a low self opinion even if they are open source and whatnot (insert joke about the open source Torment Nexus here).
I have never used TikTok so I didn’t need any migration.
Web search
This one I did not expect to get to this year. I had always used Google Search but with their recent strategy of poisoning their own search results with incorrect slop (“AI”) it became unbearable to keep using it as a tool to find information. The problem is that building and updating a search index is really expensive which means that many search engines are basically just frontends for Google’s or Bing’s or Yandex’s index.
Be that as it may I went through a few trials. I tested Qwant, a French search engine, but the results were … not great for me. There’s Ecosia whose results were okayish and which claims to somehow plant trees from your searches – which is good! – but which is also increasingly deploying AI features that undermine the “saving the forest” narrative a bit. DuckDuckGo‘s search quality is kinda like Ecosia – okay but not great. Also very slop-focused. As they all seem to be.
I finally landed (for now) on Kagi – which I do pay for. It is a US company (not great), also does a lot of “AI” shit including a browser but the slop generator can be easily disabled at least. The search quality is basically where Google used to be before they decided that having the best Search Engine on the planet wasn’t a good business model.
The decision for Kagi isn’t set in stone though. Being US based is an issue and the CEO seems to be a weirdo with quite a few bad takes. Would be happy to pay for a company’s search services that do not burn money on “AI” nonsense but just build a good search experience. I do find having a search engine I do not have to fight to get the ads out very relaxing though.
Browser
I fully switched back to Firefox a few years ago when Google started to limit ad blockers in Chrome, so not much changed this year. But Mozilla is fully depending on their contract with Google making them at least billionaire adjacent and just installed a new CEO who is all in on “AI” instead of the open web so I don’t see this lasting forever. But right now the only way to not depend on Google directly is Firefox, all other browsers are just Chrome wrappers. Except Safari maybe but that is not available on the platforms I use and also … not a very good browser.
We can only hope that some new, open source browser that’s not run by people who’d rather work at a startup gains enough traction to become an alternative. The best chance for that right now is Servo who I have given money to and keep a close eye on. It’s just far from ready.
Music Streaming
As I wrote I used Youtube Music cause it’s included in my Youtube subscription. But with trying to get away from billionaires as much as possible looking at this made sense. Also: Youtube Music pays out to the artists as bad as Spotify. And while YT Music might not generate AI slop to steal even more from artists or spend their profits on weapons manufacturers or fascists it’s still bad.
There are not too many options: I settled on Qobuz which not only has better audio quality than YT Music but also pays artists significantly more. Qobuz isn’t as heavily algorithmified as most music streaming platforms and focuses more on artists and albums which I enjoy and which corresponds to my listening habits. They do have some holes in their catalogue though.
This lead me to set up a streaming server on my own network: Jellyfin. I got out my portable blueray thingy and ripped CDs and my DVDs like it was 2005 so now I also got a lot of stuff available that was an issue before. I am looking towards shifting more and more media consumption towards my own library and maybe stopping using music streaming instead going for buying albums on bandcamp or the likes. We’ll have to see how this space develops.
This does have the added benefit of me being able to curate a controlled library of kid friendly shows for my son that he can watch in his media time.
Misc Services
There are many services that one sometimes used to use that often integrate well with Google’s infrastructure. I sometimes used Google Forms to collect data, I used Doodle to figure out dates.
Currently I migrated most of those apps to their Nextcloud counterparts: I use Polls as Doodle replacement, Forms instead of Google Forms and Cospend to split bills.
This does work, it often is a lot less convenient though. Things don’t have simple to use mobile apps, the UI hasn’t gone through 10 rounds of A/B testing. On the other hand the only dark patterns in there are just bugs. So I can live with it.
The Challenges Ahead
As I wrote in the beginning: This is all a work in progress. Many things I landed on I might change, not everything feels great TBH.
Also: People underestimate the cost of all this. Not just the financial burden (though there is quite a bit of that!) but also the extra work I put on myself. I now have to maintain even more software, software I do depend on, with data I want to keep safe. For me it’s not unbearable and sometimes it’s fun (remember? Computers used to be fun at some point) to get a thing working exactly the way you want it to. But it’s not free – even if the software doesn’t cost you anything.
Also: Currently I run those services for me (okay, my XMPP and Matrix servers have a few accounts for friends and I do host a few extra websites on my server). But a lot of software, especially cloud software is built around facilitating sharing and collaboration. For me that mostly means with either my partner or with people I write for.
The “people I write for” thing is mostly covered I think. But I am somewhat hesitant about bringing my partner in. For photos I think she’ll be fine, Immich works. But when it comes to calendars and all that I am glad that Fastmail allows me to just keep maintaining the shared calendar as a Google Calendar and not burdening her with how to setup a CalDAV server on her devices. Not cause she isn’t competent but because she’s got shit to do and I am not sure I want to be on call every time some software fails. When it’s Google’s software I can at least just shrug and wonder if they vibecoded it.
I am also stuck with an Android phone because other mobile operating systems often do not support apps I rely on (for example for my bank account etc.).
For online payment I am also often forced to use PayPal which I have not really found a good alternative for.
So there’s a lot of stuff still to do, to figure out. But I got some stuff done at least. And while it is a lot of work, thinking about the types of infrastructures we want and need is good. Especially when you allow yourself not just to install some open source clone of whatever Google or Microsoft product you used to use but actually rethink what you want your computing to be like.
